Your experience only
Gut instinct
Only as good as the trials you’ve tried. For most litigators that’s few, filtered by memory, and tied to one venue.
AI jury intelligence for litigators
Every case is priced
against a jury.
Now you can ask one.
CaseChorus seats up to 100 jurors built from Census data for the county where your case will be heard, shows them your evidence, and turns their doubts into discovery, motions, and a number you can defend. The same afternoon.
Built by a trial lawyer with 7,500+ cases. Engineering experience from Clio and Amazon.
Inside a panel session
9Juror 9Leaning defensePremises liability
PlaintiffUndecidedDefense
“I believe she was hurt. What I don’t see is anything showing the store knew the floor was wet.”
Drafted · Request for productionRequest No. 14All documents concerning Defendant’s policies governing floor safety inspections, sweep logs, and spill response in effect on December 1, 2025.
Today, what a jury would do is a guess.
Juries resolve fewer than 0.3% of state civil cases.1 Every other case still settles in their shadow, and the real alternative to CaseChorus is doing without.
One opinion
A colleague
One opinion, not a jury. Solo and small-firm lawyers often have no one to ask and no time to research.
Days of work
A do-it-yourself focus group
Recruit locals, book a room, write the script, and hope the right people show up. Days of work for one read.
$10K–$100K+ · weeks
A mock jury
$10K to $100K+,2 weeks of lead time, and one shot frozen in time. Saved for the rare case headed to trial.
CaseChorus puts a focus group on every case, without the recruiting, the room, or the $10K. Rerun it whenever the case changes.
See how it works1 Center for Justice & Democracy analysis of National Center for State Courts data, 2024 dispositions in reporting states · 2 IMS Legal Strategies mock trial cost guide · Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
How it works · One case, one afternoon
From a juror’s objection to filing-ready work.
Load a matter, add what you have, and put it in front of a panel. You get reactions in plain language, and work you can use the same afternoon.
- 1
Seat
Up to 100 jurors built from Census data for the county where the case will be heard.
- 2
React
Show them the record: documents, scans, photos. Each reacts in their own words.
- 3
Probe
Go one-on-one with the skeptic. Push back, and hear what would move them.
- 4
Act
Turn the objection into discovery requests, deposition topics, or voir dire.
Inside a panel session
9Juror 9Leaning defensePremises liability
PlaintiffUndecidedDefense
“I believe she was hurt. What I don’t see is anything showing the store knew the floor was wet.”
Drafted · Request for production
Request No. 14
All documents and communications concerning Defendant’s policies, procedures, and standard operating guidelines governing the frequency and documentation of floor safety inspections, sweep logs, and spill response in effect on December 1, 2025, including any revisions made since the incident.
4Juror 4UndecidedTrucking
PlaintiffUndecidedDefense
“Eleven hours behind the wheel is a long day. I’d want to know if the company pushed him to make that delivery window.”
Drafted · Corporate rep deposition topics
Rule 30(b)(6) Topics
- Dispatch and scheduling of the subject delivery, including the assigned delivery window and any communications with the driver about it.
- Hours-of-service records, ELD data, and logbooks for the driver for the 8 days before the collision.
- Driver compensation, including any per-load, on-time, or delivery-window incentives in effect on the date of the collision.
7Juror 7Leaning defenseMedical malpractice
PlaintiffUndecidedDefense
“Doctors miss things. Was this something any doctor would have caught, or just this one?”
Drafted · Voir dire
Questions for the panel
- Has anyone here, or anyone close to you, ever believed a doctor made a mistake in their care?
- Does anyone feel doctors should not be held responsible for errors because medicine is inherently uncertain?
- Would anyone have difficulty returning a verdict against a physician, even if the evidence showed the standard of care was not met?
2Juror 2Leaning plaintiffProduct liability
PlaintiffUndecidedDefense
“If they knew the lid could come off under pressure and kept selling it, that’s what I’d want to hear about.”
Drafted · Interrogatories
Interrogatory No. 7
Identify each complaint, warranty claim, incident report, or lawsuit Defendant has received since January 1, 2024 alleging that the lid of any model of its electric pressure cooker opened or separated while under pressure, and for each, state the date, model number, claimed injury, and disposition.
Illustrative examples. Swipe for more.
Every stage turns on one question: what would a jury do?
Not a verdict prediction. A panel in your corner from intake to trial: test an idea, push back, rerun, repeat.
Select a stage
Stage 1 of 7 · Intake
The fact that decides it
See how a jury reads the case before you sign it: first impressions, which fact carries it, and which one quietly sinks it, while there is still time to act on either.
The fact that decides it
See how a jury reads the case before you sign it: first impressions, which fact carries it, and which one quietly sinks it, while there is still time to act on either.
A number you can defend
Hear what damages a panel would consider and what moves it up or down, so your demand rests on something firmer than instinct.
Discovery worth serving
Turn a panel’s questions into requests, interrogatories, and subpoenas written in language you can file, not a summary you have to translate.
Depositions built on real doubts
Build outlines around the objections jurors actually voiced, so the testimony you lock in answers the questions a panel will ask.
Motions worth filing
See what evidence would unfairly move a panel and where your exposure sits, so motion practice is aimed rather than reflexive.
An argument you can try out
Run your theory and the other side’s, hear the pushback, change a word, and run it again. Walk into mediation or arbitration knowing where the case is strong and where it is exposed.
Who you want in the box
Learn which backgrounds line up against you and what to ask to find them, and test your themes long before you stand in front of a venire.
A chatbot gives you one voice.
CaseChorus gives you a jury built for real cases.
Grounded in the venue
Census-weighted panels for the actual venue, or a national cross-section when venue is undecided. Jurors keep their seats, so you can swap one and see how much the case turns on a single person.
Built by a trial lawyer
7,500+cases behind the design
Designed on a live caseload by a plaintiff trial lawyer with 20+ years of practice and Super Lawyers recognition every year since 2020. The output is the work itself: requests for production, interrogatories, deposition topics, voir dire.
Built for confidentiality
Encrypted and isolated by firm. Matters, exhibits, and sessions persist so your team can rerun and compare. Security summary · DPA
Billable to the matter
A per-use AI cost tied to a specific matter may be billed to the client as a case expense, at actual cost, with disclosure. For a contingency firm, that is a cost the recovery can reimburse.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024). State rules vary. Not legal advice.
Early access
Ask your first jury.
We’re working closely with a small group of firms while the product takes shape. Tell us about your practice and we’ll be in touch about a look.
- Personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and more
- Solo practitioners through large firms, plaintiff and defense
- Built to run on live matters every week, not once a year
Thank you, we have it.
We’ll be in touch by email about a look at CaseChorus.